2026 House forecast · v0.25-r4

Democrats are favored to win House control.

Site release updated November 3, 2026 · House estimates and the frozen House simulation remain on the November 3, 2026 model · polls through November 1, 2026

Experimental model. The COYNTOSS House model is experimental. It has not completed a historical backtest, its win probabilities are not yet historically calibrated, and it is being actively developed, so its methods, ratings and probabilities may change from one release to the next. Treat these numbers as a work in progress, not a finished forecast.

83.8%Democratic chance
16.2%Republican chance
239.3 expected Democratic seats 195.7 expected Republican seats
Median D seats
238

218 for a majority

80% range
212–268

Democratic seats

Toss-ups
33

of 435 districts

Closest district
FL-22

D+0.1 · Toss-up

Every district by forecast rating

Interactive 2026 U.S. House forecast map A district-level map of the 435 voting seats in the U.S. House. Select a district for candidate, margin, rating, percent chance, and polling details.
Solid DLikely DLean DToss-upLean RLikely RSolid R

Geometry and forecast data loading…

THE HOUSE, SEAT BY SEAT

All 435 districts, from most Democratic to most Republican

Loading the seat chart…

THE CLOSE RACES

Where polls and fundamentals pull the model

The closest districts that have district polls, within five points. The hollow circles are the two published ingredients; the solid dot is the published model margin.

Loading districts…

THE BATTLEGROUND

The toss-up districts

Ordered by how close the projected margin is. Bars show each side's exported chance of winning.

EVERY STATE

Open a state's House forecast

Each bar is one state's districts from most Democratic to most Republican, colored by rating.

Alabama7 seats1 D · 6 R lead · 1 competitiveAlaska1 seat0 D · 1 R lead · 1 competitiveArizona9 seats5 D · 4 R lead · 5 competitiveArkansas4 seats0 D · 4 R lead · 1 competitiveCalifornia52 seats48 D · 4 R lead · 7 competitiveColorado8 seats5 D · 3 R lead · 4 competitiveConnecticut5 seats5 D · 0 R lead · No competitive seatsDelaware1 seat1 D · 0 R lead · No competitive seatsFlorida28 seats7 D · 21 R lead · 20 competitiveGeorgia14 seats5 D · 9 R lead · 3 competitiveHawaii2 seats2 D · 0 R lead · No competitive seatsIdaho2 seats0 D · 2 R lead · No competitive seatsIllinois17 seats14 D · 3 R lead · No competitive seatsIndiana9 seats2 D · 7 R lead · 1 competitiveIowa4 seats3 D · 1 R lead · 3 competitiveKansas4 seats1 D · 3 R lead · 1 competitiveKentucky6 seats1 D · 5 R lead · 1 competitiveLouisiana6 seats1 D · 5 R lead · No competitive seatsMaine2 seats2 D · 0 R lead · 1 competitiveMaryland8 seats7 D · 1 R lead · 1 competitiveMassachusetts9 seats9 D · 0 R lead · No competitive seatsMichigan13 seats8 D · 5 R lead · 3 competitiveMinnesota8 seats4 D · 4 R lead · 3 competitiveMississippi4 seats1 D · 3 R lead · No competitive seatsMissouri8 seats2 D · 6 R lead · 1 competitiveMontana2 seats1 D · 1 R lead · 1 competitiveNebraska3 seats1 D · 2 R lead · 2 competitiveNevada4 seats3 D · 1 R lead · 2 competitiveNew Hampshire2 seats2 D · 0 R lead · 2 competitiveNew Jersey12 seats10 D · 2 R lead · 2 competitiveNew Mexico3 seats3 D · 0 R lead · 1 competitiveNew York26 seats20 D · 6 R lead · 6 competitiveNorth Carolina14 seats5 D · 9 R lead · 11 competitiveNorth Dakota1 seat0 D · 1 R lead · No competitive seatsOhio15 seats6 D · 9 R lead · 7 competitiveOklahoma5 seats0 D · 5 R lead · 1 competitiveOregon6 seats5 D · 1 R lead · No competitive seatsPennsylvania17 seats10 D · 7 R lead · 4 competitiveRhode Island2 seats2 D · 0 R lead · No competitive seatsSouth Carolina7 seats1 D · 6 R lead · 2 competitiveSouth Dakota1 seat0 D · 1 R lead · No competitive seatsTennessee9 seats0 D · 9 R lead · 3 competitiveTexas38 seats10 D · 28 R lead · 16 competitiveUtah4 seats1 D · 3 R lead · 1 competitiveVermont1 seat1 D · 0 R lead · No competitive seatsVirginia11 seats7 D · 4 R lead · 4 competitiveWashington10 seats8 D · 2 R lead · 3 competitiveWest Virginia2 seats0 D · 2 R lead · No competitive seatsWisconsin8 seats3 D · 5 R lead · 4 competitiveWyoming1 seat0 D · 1 R lead · No competitive seats

PUBLISHED FROZEN OUTLOOK

Seats and uncertainty

Average Democratic seats
239.3
Median Democratic seats
238
Central 80% of simulations
212–268
0218 for control435

Average seats are the mean across simulations; the median is the middle outcome. The central 80% range is the 10th to 90th percentile, with outcomes outside it still possible.

Model inputs November 3, 2026 · simulation run November 3, 2026 (UTC) · 10,000 draws · run V0.25-R4-20261103-S20261103 · polls through 2026-11-01 · PROVISIONAL / VALIDATED FUNDAMENTALS (EXP-H001).

CONDITIONAL SCENARIOS · PROVISIONAL

What if the national environment changes?

These exported diagnostic reruns change the national generic-ballot assumption while holding the other model inputs fixed. They are conditional scenarios, not a new forecast or a replacement for the published frozen outlook above. Even the baseline rerun can differ from the official snapshot.

Current inputs · national margin D+8.3

Diagnostic average D seats
239.2
Diagnostic D control chance
83.7%
Diagnostic central 80%
212–269
180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330218 for controlDemocratic seats · each dot is 1% of simulated outcomes

Exact seat frequencies
180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330

All scenarios are listed below. Interactive selection becomes available when the matching scenario data loads.

Exported conditional scenarios; Democratic seat totals
ScenarioNational marginAverage seatsControl chanceCentral 80%
Generic ballot 4 points more RepublicanD+4.3225.463.4%201–252
Generic ballot 2 points more RepublicanD+6.3232.174.6%206–260
Current inputsD+8.3239.283.7%212–269
Generic ballot 2 points more DemocraticD+10.3246.890.3%218–278
Generic ballot 4 points more DemocraticD+12.3255.094.7%224–288
Scenario assumptions and source

PROVISIONAL / UNCALIBRATED · 50,000 draws · seed 20261103 · source run V0.25-R4-20261103-S20261103 · source release 2026-11-03-01.

  • Each generic-ballot shift changes an unconstrained district center by shift × (1 − its existing polling blend); verified same-party ballots retain their fixed party control. +/-100 encodes ballot eligibility, not a candidate vote-margin estimate.
  • Polling, district leans, candidates, uncertainty and the shared-error settings stay fixed.
  • All scenarios use the same random draws, so their differences reflect the specified shift.
  • No coefficient was chosen to match VoteHub or another forecast.
  • District centers/blends: updated-site/data/house-forecast.json.
  • District total and residual sigmas: data/house-source-export/probability-inputs.json.
  • Shared-error settings and generic ballot: data/house-diagnostic-settings.json, copied from the identified workbook run.
  • Seeded diagnostics use a separate random stream from the official frozen simulation; small numerical differences are expected.
  • Conditional scenarios, not a new official election forecast or a calibrated prediction.
  • The House model and its uncertainty settings have not completed a historical backtest.
  • The official frozen snapshot remains separate from these diagnostic reruns.
Download scenario data →

Methodology

How the House forecast works

Each district combines its fundamentals (presidential results on the current map, the national environment, incumbency and past House results) with district polling where it exists; a seeded simulation turns those estimates into seat and control chances. This is a beta model, and its win probabilities are not yet historically calibrated.